A Bank of England report says the European investment-grade corporate bond market could reach the “breaking point” if investors collectively withdrew 1.3 percent of total assets.
In its highly anticipated report, “Simulated Stress Across the Financial System: The Resilience of Corporate Bond Markets,” the British central bank outlines a pattern of behavior that would lead to the breakdown in the European bond ecosystem.
Analysts for the bank suggest that when withdrawals exceed 1.3 percent, fund managers would begin hoarding cash to meet redemptions and hedge funds would likely fail to supply liquidity for bond buying and selling.
The report also finds that in times of high market stress, bond market intermediaries, such as investment banks, would be less willing or able to intermediate markets when redemptions exceeded 0.9% of total assets. However, bank analysts acknowledge that this threshold could be as high as 2.4% of assets in periods of low market stress.
“The level of redemptions at which corporate bond market dislocation occurs is determined by the ability and willingness of dealers to intermediate markets, which is assumed to vary with market stress,” the report notes. “If the dealer is exposed to significant market volatility when redemptions occur and expects to incur losses, the dealer is more likely to reduce its risk appetite and its provision of market intermediation services to the extent that even moderate levels of redemptions and asset sales could overwhelm the market capacity to absorb them.”
The Bank of England report made reference to a run on United Kingdom real-estate funds in July 2016, after fund management groups put a temporary ban on withdrawals from institutions overwhelmed with redemption requests in the wake of the Brexit vote.
TwentyFour Asset Management bond fund manager Chris Bowie told Institutional Investor that this episode showed how widespread illiquidity could lead to investor panic.
Alex Biles, the debt capital markets partner at law firm Ashurst, says the report heralded the beginning of a “system-wide stress simulation” for the bond market. “This consultation shows that the regulators are not just looking at behaviors within individual institutions that could threaten financial stability but also the ability of parts of the financial markets to support the real economy in bad times as well as good.”
In a letter in 2016, the Investment Company Institute, a global trade association representing mutual funds, called on the G20’s Financial Stability Board to “substantiate its concerns that there could be destabilizing redemptions” from open-ended funds.
However, some fund management groups have given a warmer response to the Bank of England report, saying that it was wise to try to get ahead of any future crisis and assess all potential future causes of instability.
“There has been a degree of worry,” says James McCann, senior global economist at Standard Life Investments. “We are monitoring what the regulators do. If the next downturn doesn’t emanate from banks, it [the Bank of England] won’t want to have been complacent.”
James Vokins, a fixed income portfolio manager at Aviva Investors, agrees, noting that bond liquidity is likely to be “an ongoing issue.” He adds: “It is timely at the moment because there is a general sense that central bankers are becoming more hawkish.”