This content is from: ThinkTank

A Nuanced Guide to Good Yield Hunting

  • Lyxor ETF

Equity investors hunting for yield need to consider their chosen destinations carefully. On the face of it, payouts, fuelled by rising earnings, look robust, but scratch beneath the surface and it becomes clear that dividend cover is stretched thin in some parts of the world. A more nuanced approach is vital, so best to keep the following in mind.

Don’t just jump at attractive dividends

When rates are low, as they are today, dividends are highly prized by investors, prompting some companies to pay them regardless of their earnings. This can lead to a significant decline in dividend cover. We saw this earlier in the year in the UK, when (according to Capita’s Q2 2017 Dividend Monitor) coverage dropped to just 0.8x – the lowest level since 2009. 

Income is expensive

Investors are paying a lot for income by historic standards, with the MSCI World’s dividend yield at its lowest in 10 years. The growth in global dividend payouts may look impressive, but beneath the surface is a problem of peak dividend payouts and peak share prices. Overpaying for income is a real danger.

Beware dividend cuts

When payouts and share prices are at a peak, inevitably there is a greater risk of dividend cuts. After all, a high yield isn’t always a good yield – some companies offer high dividends because they involve an element of distress.

At Lyxor, we have no interest in such companies. Instead, we focus on less fashionable, more mature companies that can pay – and keep on paying – a high dividend. They still represent solid, low-risk investments.

We use nine key tests to analyse each prospective investment’s balance sheet strength and cash flow in order to determine whether it is of high enough quality for us to invest. From there, we look at whether we can buy them with a sufficiently high dividend yield. 

The type of business our approach leads us to shifts over time. Right now, for example, it’s difficult to pick up consumer staples businesses with a high enough yield. So, our global portfolio is currently weighted towards telecoms, utilities, industrials, and pharmaceuticals. This positioning ebbs and flows with the markets – as stocks get more expensive, the strategy naturally moves towards more defensive, less popular areas.

The following are key considerations, amongst others:

Ensuring an attractive yield

A stock needs to pay a 4% dividend for us to invest, and if this drops below 3.5%, we sell it. The only exception is for our Japanese index, which has a starting yield of around 2.5%.

A selective approach

In our global portfolio, we tend to have significant, enduring exposures to countries like Canada and Australia, which have tax-friendly, well-established dividend regimes. We also favour countries where the right kinds of businesses have a firm foothold, such as the UK (pharmaceuticals) and Switzerland (consumer goods producers).

In the US, the S&P 500’s yield habitually hovers around 2%, so finding a higher yield means narrowing your search. We can find plenty of high quality businesses, but their tendency to substitute dividend payments with share buybacks means our process cannot identify enough good companies with high enough dividend yields to justify a higher weighting in our global portfolio. Other strategies might have more leeway. For us, Europe and Asia are better hunting grounds. 

The attraction of Europe

Continental Europe is a bountiful region for dividend investors because of the diversity of companies providing an attractive yield. Around a third of the global 4% dividend yield universe can be found in Europe, and about 30% of European stocks provide a yield of 4% or more.

All European equity sectors currently offer a dividend yield in excess of the 10-year bund yield. Six offer a yield greater than 4%, but we are currently focusing on traditional areas like utilities, telecoms, and consumer services. Overall, the ground is fertile enough for our European strategy to yield more than 4.5%.

The next dividend frontier? Asia

Asia is becoming much more attractive from a dividend perspective. Companies across the region have been steadily increasing their dividends for some time, and there’s much more scope here for dividend growth than, for example, in the UK. You also get more natural diversification – dividend payers come from across the industry spectrum, including technology.

Japan, for its part, has long been relatively uninspiring for dividend seekers, with low yields and high valuations. But corporate governance has improved and share prices have fallen, and Japan now has the best dividend cover and payout ratio in the world. We’re much more interested in Japan today than we used to be, and will soon launch a dividend ETF providing discrete exposure to Japan. It will adopt the same methodology as our global strategy and apply it to the Japanese market. 

Disclaimers:

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions/data sourced from SG Cross Asset & Global Quantitative Research teams. Opinions expressed are as at 23 August 2017.

THIS DOCUMENT IS DIRECTED AT PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS ONLY

This document is for the exclusive use of investors acting on their own account and categorised either as “Eligible Counterparties” or “Professional Clients” within the meaning of Markets In Financial Instruments Directive 2004/39/EC.

This document is of a commercial nature and not of a regulatory nature. This document does not constitute an offer, or an invitation to make an offer, from Société Générale, Lyxor International Asset Management or any of their respective affiliates or subsidiaries to purchase or sell the product referred to herein.

We recommend to investors who wish to obtain further information on their tax status that they seek assistance from their tax advisor. The attention of the investor is drawn to the fact that the net asset value stated in this document (as the case may be) cannot be used as a basis for subscriptions and/or redemptions. The market information displayed in this document is based on data at a given moment and may change from time to time. The figures relating to past performances refer or relate to past periods and are not a reliable indicator of future results. This also applies to historical market data. The potential return may be reduced by the effect of commissions, fees, taxes or other charges borne by the investor.

Lyxor International Asset Management (Lyxor ETF), société par actions simplifiée having its registered office at Tours Société Générale, 17 cours Valmy, 92800 Puteaux (France), 418 862 215 RCS Nanterre, is authorized and regulated by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) under the UCITS Directive and the AIFM Directive (2011/31/EU). Lyxor ETF is represented in the UK by Lyxor Asset Management UK LLP, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK under Registration Number 435658.

Research disclaimer

This material reflects the views and opinions of the individual authors at this date and in no way the official position or advices of any kind of these authors or of Lyxor International Asset Management and thus does not engage the responsibility of Lyxor International Asset Management nor of any of its officers or employees. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients. Clients should consider whether any advice or recommendation in this research is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if appropriate, seek professional advice, including tax advice. Our salespeople, traders, and other professionals may provide oral or written market commentary or trading strategies to our clients and principal trading desks that reflect opinions that are contrary to the opinions expressed in this research. Our asset management area, principal trading desks and investing businesses may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or views expressed in this research.