Examiner’s Report Highlights Lehman’s Controversial ‘Repo 105' Accounting

Bankruptcy examiner Anton Valukas’s report highlights Lehman’s questionable accounting device Repo 105.

HOLLINGER RADLER GUILTY

Anton Valukas, right, attorney for former Chicago Sun-Times publisher David Radler, speaks to a man outside a federal courthouse in Chicago, Illinois, Tuesday, September 20, 2005. David Radler, the former chief operating officer of Hollinger International Inc., pleaded guilty to a federal fraud charge and agreed to cooperate with a Justice Department probe of his former boss, Conrad Black. Photographer: Frank Polich/Bloomberg News.

FRANK POLICH/BLOOMBERG NEWS

Anton Valukas

Anton Valukas

FRANK POLICH/BLOOMBERG NEWS

In his damning analysis of the spectacular collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings, court-appointed examiner Anton Valukas found that conduct by Lehman executives that eventually led to the investment banking firm’s bankruptcy ranged from “serious but nonculpable errors of business judgment to actionable balance sheet manipulation.”

At the core of this questionable activity is a controversial accounting device that was known inside Lehman as Repo 105. In his report, Valukas describes the tactic and details the extent to which it allowed the firm to doctor its balance sheet and misrepresent its desperate situation.

Here are some highlights from the 2,200-page report:

• “Although Repo 105 transactions may not have been inherently improper, there is a colorable claim that their sole function as employed by Lehman was balance sheet manipulation. Lehman’s own accounting personnel described Repo 105 transactions as an ‘accounting gimmick’ and a ‘lazy way of managing the balance sheet as opposed to legitimately meeting balance sheet targets at quarter end.’”

• “In an ordinary repo, Lehman raised cash by selling assets with a simultaneous obligation to repurchase them the next day or several days later; such transactions were accounted for as financings, and the assets remained on Lehman’s balance sheet. In a Repo 105 transaction, Lehman did exactly the same thing, but because the assets were 105 percent or more of the cash received, accounting rules permitted the transactions to be treated as sales rather than financings, so that the assets could be removed from the balance sheet.”

Sponsored

• “Lehman turned to Repo 105 transactions to temporarily remove $50 billion of assets from its balance sheet at first- and second-quarter ends in 2008 so that it could report significantly lower net leverage numbers than reality.”

Here is the full text of the report on Lehman’s collapse prepared by court-appointed examiner Anton Valukas:

Volume 1- Sections I & II: Introduction, Executive Summary & Procedural Background; Section III.A.1: Risk

Volume 2- Section III.A.2: Valuation; Section III.A.3: Survival

Volume 3- Section III.A.4: Repo 105

Volume 4- Section III.A.5: Secured Lenders; Section III.A.6: Government

Volume 5- Section III.B: Avoidance Actions; Section III.C: Barclays Transaction

Volume 6- Appendix 1

Volume 7- Appendices 2 - 7

Volume 8- Appendices 8 - 22

Volume 9- Appendices 23 - 34

Related